<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Greg Tyrelle &#187; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tyrelle.net/category/science/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tyrelle.net/weblog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 21:48:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>No design for aging</title>
		<link>http://www.tyrelle.net/weblog/2010/05/13/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tyrelle.net/weblog/2010/05/13/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 00:08:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg Tyrelle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[creationism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tyrelle.net/?p=13</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For the most part I ignore the debate about whether or not god exists as it is evident that there is no evidence for such claims, so why post on the topic now ? The point is not to join that debate &#8212; as amusing as the debate tends to be &#8211;  but  to add [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the most part I ignore the debate about whether or not god exists as it is evident that there is no evidence for such claims, so why post on the topic now ? The point is not to join that debate &#8212; as amusing as the debate tends to be &#8211;  but  to add what I consider another  argument in favour of no god or gods existing. Intelligent design which posits the idea of a supernatural creator as an alternative explanation for the presence of life is very much a contradiction in terms. Anyone with the slightest understanding of biology will tell you: if <em>homo sapiens</em> was designed then, it was not very intelligently designed.</p>
<p>For the sake of argument, let&#8217;s assume there really is a designer and wonder what that creator had in mind when they designed human beings to age. Aging is a horrible disease that results in the gradual degradation of bodily systems and eventual death. Osteoporosis, blindness, hearing loss and neurodegenerative disease are just a few ailments of old age. Why would any creator design an organism with an expiry date, then allow that organism to decline towards that date, in horrible, awful ways ? It is inconceivable that this is intelligent design. No reasonable person can possibly believe it.</p>
<div id="tweetbutton13" class="tw_button" style=";float:none;margin:0 auto;text-align:center;"><a href="http://twitter.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tyrelle.net%2Fweblog%2F2010%2F05%2F13%2F&amp;text=No%20design%20for%20aging&amp;related=&amp;lang=en&amp;count=horizontal&amp;counturl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tyrelle.net%2Fweblog%2F2010%2F05%2F13%2F" class="twitter-share-button"  style="width:55px;height:22px;background:transparent url('http://www.tyrelle.net/weblog/wp-content/plugins/wp-tweet-button/tweetn.png') no-repeat  0 0;text-align:left;text-indent:-9999px;display:block;">Tweet</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tyrelle.net/weblog/2010/05/13/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

